Despite persistent inadequacies, large-scale industrial agriculture remains the most touted solution to global hunger in development discourse. However, an increasing number of reports and research from intergovernmental agencies including the UNEP and FAO, among others, endorse agro-ecological approaches that prioritize smallholder crop production to successfully meet the challenges of climate change and hunger.
The current development landscape is dominated by Green Revolution ideals—genetically modified seeds used in capital-intensive large-scale agriculture schemes with a prominent role for pesticides and fertilizers. These efforts claim to feed the developing world. Instead, the schemes are realized as large tracts of monoculture that prioritize export market crops, require increased mechanization, and are dependent on multinationals for chemicals and seeds. According to a May 2011 policy brief from the UN’s Least Developed Country series, the four biggest agricultural supply companies control “60% of global agro-chemical, 30% of seed, and almost 40% of biotechnology supply.”
In 2008, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), an intergovernmental multi-stakeholder process sponsored by the FAO, GEF, UNDP, UNEP, UNESCO, the World Bank, and WHO, released a comprehensive and rigorous report based on the evidence and assessments of thousands of experts worldwide, stating: “It is clear that ecological agriculture is productive and has the potential to meet food security needs, particularly in developing countries.”
The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food reports that agro-ecological systems can double small farmers’ agricultural output in 10 years. Rice Intensification Schemes (small-scale village-based irrigation systems) implemented along the Niger River in Mali produce an average of 9 tons per hectare, more than twice the yield of conventionally farmed areas.
In 2013, a UN report held smallholder farmers as the key to lifting over one billion people out of poverty.
By adhering to a high investigative standard with consideration of local impact and international trends, OI advocates for agro-ecological farming methods that empower local producers and reports the effects of current agribusiness models. OI provides honest policy proposals that lead to concrete solutions, guided by the belief that small agriculture can feed the world.
16-30% of greenhouse gases result from the agricultural sector, depending on the inclusion of processing, packing, and transportation in calculations. Industrialized agriculture, which relies on intensive resource use, is largely responsible for the high numbers.
A review of agricultural development projects in 57 low-income countries by the FAO found that more efficient use of water, reduced use of pesticides, and improvements in soil health led to average crop yield increases of 79 percent.
Research by the UN and numerous other bodies demonstrates that sustainable agriculture improves food supply, nutrition, and livelihoods in LDCs.
A UNEP-UNCTAD analysis of 114 cases in Africa revealed that a shift toward organic agriculture production increased yields by 116%.
$192 million: the estimated annual value to be gained from ecosystem services if half of the arable area under conventional farming is shifted to organic.
Thirty-three case studies that shed light on the tremendous success of agroecological agriculture across the African continent.